London pensioners could lose ticket to ride the Tube for free

London pensioners have long enjoyed free travel across the whole of the city’s transport network, including the Underground and Overground rail services, in contrast to much of the rest of the country.

However, London Councils, the umbrella body that administers the scheme on behalf of the local authorities for the capital’s 32 boroughs and the City of London, is launching a review, which could recommend that free travel for Londoners aged 66 and above be restricted solely to bus services.

The annual cost of the scheme is expected to increase by more than 10 per cent this year to £372 million. The scheme is ultimately paid for by taxpayers in local authorities, and the payments effectively offer compensation to operators, including Transport for London, as well as bus and rail concession operators.

The increased bill comes at the same time as London’s local authorities face a spending squeeze in other areas, from social care to special needs provision.

In much of the rest of the country, the Freedom Pass allows Britons aged 66 and older to access free off-peak bus travel. In London, that travel concession is extended to all forms of available travel.

Hand holding a purple Freedom Pass from Lambeth Council at Farringdon railway station.

Each Freedom Pass is issued by a London borough

Stephen Boon, the chief operating officer at London Councils, told a pre-Christmas meeting that the scheme’s costs would be reduced to £224 million per year if London’s Freedom Pass entitlements were reduced solely to bus services.

Increased use of the network by those using a Freedom Pass has driven costs, as has a change to the way Elizabeth Line journeys are calculated. For the first time this year, TfL will also charge London Councils for the cost of Oyster cards that the Freedom Pass benefits are attached to. That amounts to £1.50 per card multiplied by the anticipated number of passes, nearly 400,000.

An elderly man with a cane and a bag stands on the platform of the newly opened Bond Street Station of the Elizabeth Line.

The Elizabeth Line opened in 2022

RICHARD BAKER/GETTY IMAGES

In agenda papers for a meeting of London Councils’ transport and environment committee, Boon said that the Society of London Treasurers — a grouping of the London boroughs’ chief financial officers — had “expressed concern about the growing cost of the Freedom Pass scheme.”

Boon said his officers “will continue to work … to identify what other policy options might be used to control the cost of the scheme in future.”

The story was first reported by the Evening Standard. Any changes to the eligibility criteria would require parliament to make amends to the Greater London Assembly Act 1999.

Alexander Ehmann, a member of the transport and environment committee and a Liberal Democrat councillor in Richmond, described “the cost of the Freedom Pass [as] a ticking time bomb for London local authorities.

“The spiralling costs come at a time where councils such as Richmond are already set to be hobbled by £30 million plus in year cuts, as part of the ironically named ‘fair funding reforms’ of the Labour government.

“Within a handful of years, the bill for London local authorities will be an unsustainable half a billion pounds, so proper financial support from the government is urgent.”

Local authorities in the capital are set to be hit by changes to funding, and many wealthier areas, such as Richmond, are anticipating substantial cuts.

Residents of Liverpool can use their Freedom Pass to use trains, whereas in Manchester older residents can choose to pay an extra £10 for access to trams and trains within the city.

The Freedom Pass is different from the 60+ London Oyster card, which also allows free travel across the network in off-peak hours. This card is administered and “funded” by TfL, though technically TfL writes off the cost as revenue lost. In the past year, TfL missed out on £125 million worth of revenue from 60 to 65-year-olds. The cost is expected to increase to £180 million by 2027.

The 60+ card was introduced by Boris Johnson during his term as mayor, when he moved London away from the rest of the country’s free travel scheme, which was pegged to pension age. Sir Sadiq Khan has extended the scheme.

Last year a TfL spokesman said: “We regularly review our range of concessions to ensure that they continue to benefit Londoners, while also remaining affordable for TfL to operate. There are no plans to discontinue the 60+ Oyster photocard.”

In Minnesota alone, more than 100 refugees were reportedly arrested in recent weeks before a federal judge stepped in to halt detentions and order releases. A broader court fight is looming — one that could reshape how refugees are treated nationwide.  With refugee admissions already slashed and new reviews underway, thousands could be affected.  They came to the U.S. legally, fleeing persecution.  Now many are asking: after surviving everything else… are they about to face detention here?
Colbert says network lawyers pressured him not to air it. CBS says that’s not true. Meanwhile, the political backdrop is anything but quiet — from corporate mergers to renewed “equal time” scrutiny from the FCC.  And here’s the twist: Talarico’s campaign reportedly raised $2.5 million in the fallout.  A segment that never aired on television just became one of the most-watched political interviews online.  So what was said that sparked 85 million views — and a network standoff?
Unknown DNA. And what used to be a dead end is now the most powerful lead in the case.  Investigators searching for answers in the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie are diving into investigative genetic genealogy — the same cutting-edge technique that helped identify the Golden State Killer and track Bryan Kohberger.  The glove found two miles from her Tucson home didn’t match anyone in CODIS. DNA collected at the house didn’t match either. Years ago, that would have stalled the case.  Now? It could be the breakthrough.  By combing through public DNA databases, experts can identify distant relatives of an unknown suspect — sometimes from less than 1% shared DNA — and build a family tree that narrows the search to a single name. It can take minutes. Or it can take years.
A masked man. A single glove. And now — DNA that could unmask a kidnapper.  Three weeks after 84-year-old Nancy Guthrie vanished from her Tucson home, investigators are turning to cutting-edge genetic genealogy in a high-stakes effort to identify a suspect. DNA recovered near the scene didn’t match anything in the FBI’s CODIS database. But authorities believe they may have found genetic material that belongs to the person who took her.  If that’s true, experts say it’s only a matter of time.  The same investigative technique helped catch the Golden State Killer and Bryan Kohberger. Now it could expose whoever was caught on camera outside Guthrie’s home — armed, masked, wearing a distinctive Ozark Trail backpack.  More than 19,000 tips have poured in. A reward exceeding $200,000 is on the table. Federal, state, and local agencies are combing through partial DNA, security footage, credit card trails, even backpack sales across Arizona.  And the sheriff has a warning: if you’re responsible, you should be worried.  Because this case isn’t cold. And the science may be closing in.
Meanwhile, investigators are chasing DNA that doesn’t match, analyzing biological evidence still in the lab, probing recent gun purchases, and even scanning for signals from Guthrie’s pacemaker, which mysteriously disconnected from her phone hours before she was reported missing.  Gloves with unknown DNA found miles away. Extra security cameras still being processed. A possible second person involved.  Someone knows what happened that night.  And authorities believe this case is far from random.
Officials say the victim’s spouse was not part of the rescue operation — but the emotional toll on the tight-knit search and rescue community is profound. “We’re all trying to support the family,” Woo said.  As identities remain unconfirmed and the storm refuses to let up, the tragedy is rippling through Lake Tahoe’s ski world — from elite academies to volunteer rescuers who now find themselves grieving while still on duty.  When the call for help came in, they answered.
Multiple victims had deep ties to Sugar Bowl Resort and its elite ski academy — a tight-knit community that has produced Olympians and generations of Tahoe athletes. Friends. Mothers. Longtime ski partners who made this trip every year.  They were experienced. It was guided. So how did everything unravel so fast?  As rescue crews battle relentless storms and families wait for answers, the tragedy is sending shockwaves from Mill Valley to Stanford to the heart of the Sierra.  And the hardest questions are only just beginning.
With extreme warnings in place, brutal storm conditions rolling in, and a 15-person group navigating high-risk terrain near Lake Tahoe, investigators are now piecing together a tragedy that has shaken the entire ski community. Was it the weather? The route? A split-second decision? Or a cascade of factors no one saw coming?  Rescue teams still can’t reach the victims. Families are left with heartbreak — and “many unanswered questions.”  This wasn’t a reckless adventure. These were experienced women who loved the mountains.  So how did it end like this?