After backlash over mass surveillance fears, OpenAI and the United States Department of Defense are quietly rewriting their AI deal. New language now bans domestic surveillance of Americans — even using commercially bought data. But critics aren’t convinced. What changed behind the scenes… and what didn’t?

Scoop: OpenAI, Pentagon add more surveillance protections to AI deal

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, speaking against a black backdrop. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

OpenAI and the Pentagon have agreed to strengthen their recently agreed contract, following widespread backlash that domestic mass surveillance was still a real risk under the deal — though the language has not been formally signed, sources familiar with the pact told Axios.

Why it matters: The Pentagon’s deal with Anthropic to use Claude for national security blew up, and the prospect of securing an agreement with OpenAI appeared to be on thin ice if concerns around mass domestic surveillance weren’t addressed.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman approached undersecretary of Defense for research and engineering Emil Michael to rework the contract, the sources said.

The big picture: As negotiations were deteriorating with Anthropic, the Pentagon and OpenAI began working through an alternative.

Altman said he had the same worries as Anthropic — domestic mass surveillance and autonomous weapons — and critics questioned whether civil liberties and safety would really be upheld.
That prompted the CEO to try to answer thousands of questions on X directly.
The Pentagon also had to go on a messaging spree, reassuring observers it also cared about civil liberties and had no intention to spy on Americans, and that this was a matter of letting national security be handled by the government — not a company.

“One thing I think I did wrong: we shouldn’t have rushed to get this out on Friday,” Altman said in an internal post to employees earlier on Monday, which he later shared on X.

“The issues are super complex, and demand clear communication. We were genuinely trying to de-escalate things and avoid a much worse outcome, but I think it just looked opportunistic and sloppy. Good learning experience for me as we face higher-stakes decisions in the future.”

The language seen by Axios states:

“Consistent with applicable laws, including the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, National Security Act of 1947, FISA Act of 1978, the AI system shall not be intentionally used for domestic surveillance of U.S. persons and nationals.”
“For the avoidance of doubt, the Department understands this limitation to prohibit deliberate tracking, surveillance, or monitoring of U.S. persons or nationals, including through the procurement or use of commercially acquired personal or identifiable information.”
Additionally, Altman said on X the Pentagon has affirmed OpenAI’s services will not be used by intelligence agencies like the National Security Agency and any services to those agencies would require “a follow-on modification” to the contract.

Between the lines: The amendment to the existing OpenAI-Pentagon contract, makes an explicit reference to “commercially acquired” or public information. Previously the contract named only “private information.”

That would have left geolocation, web browsing data or personal financial information purchased from data brokers up for grabs.

What they’re saying: “It’s critical to protect the civil liberties of Americans, and there was so much focus on this, that we wanted to make this point especially clear, including around commercially acquired information,” Altman said on X.

“Just like everything we do with iterative deployment, we will continue to learn and refine as we go.”

What we’re watching: The Pentagon as of Monday night has not sent Anthropic a formal notice designating the company a “supply chain risk,” as threatened last week, as Altman continues to push for the same terms to be offered to the rival company.

Editor’s note: This story has been updated with new details throughout

🚨 Savannah Guthrie is back on Today, but the brave face she shows the world masks a devastating family crisis. While standing together with her loved ones in grace, her first day back didn’t go as planned.  Behind the composure lies a story of exhaustion and pain. However, it was a sudden, serious mistake during the live broadcast that has everyone talking—a mistake so rare that she has never made it until now. What led to this uncharacteristic slip, and what does it reveal about the pressure she’s under? 🛡️👣  SEE THE MOMENT: The details of the “Serious Mistake” and the latest family update below. 👇📉
A SHOCKING TURN IN THE SEARCH. After 30 days of hope and tireless efforts to find Nancy, local authorities and volunteer teams have unexpectedly located a body in a ditch near the forest’s edge—just 12km from her residence. 🚨  The search that gripped the community for a month has reached a devastating crossroads. While official identification is still pending, the location and circumstances of the find have sent shockwaves through the neighborhood. 🛡️👣  READ THE FULL ACCOUNT: The latest details from the police briefing and the scene of the discovery below. 👇
In the early stages, Maya’s progress was happening in leaps and bounds, day by day. We were told on multiple occasions she wouldn’t make it in various ways. But now, the reality of our situation has started to settle in. My baby has a direct bullet hole in her brain… we’ve defeated the odds, but how far will we go? > Amidst this difficult journey, her mother also revealed a new and concerning health phenomenon that Maya has been enduring over the last few days, complicating her fight for recovery. ⚖️🍂  READ THE FULL MESSAGE: See Cia’s raw update and the details of Maya’s latest health struggle in the first comment. 👇