The case of little Fabian from Güstrow is considered one of the darkest chapters in recent German criminal history. But what we are uncovering today could fundamentally change everything that has been believed so far. It is a story full of cracks, suppressed screams, and a truth so uncomfortable that it ultimately blurs the line between public mourning and a private abyss.

While the investigation has so far focused largely on Gina H., who is currently in pre-trial detention, a new figure has now moved to the center of the story—someone whose testimony has exploded like a bomb: Julia.

Julia: The Woman Breaking the Silence

Julia is not a stranger. The 38-year-old elementary school teacher has been the closest confidante of Fabian’s mother, Dorina, for more than a decade. She was part of the family’s daily life, witnessing both the crises and the quiet moments that were never posted on social media.

Now Julia has stepped into the public eye openly. Her motivation is as simple as it is heartbreaking:

“The truth is more important than my peace of mind. Fabian deserves it.”

What she told investigators during recorded interrogations casts a completely new and dark light on Matthias, the father of the murdered boy. Looking back, these were warning signs that now feel like a cruel prophecy.

The Prophecy in the Kitchen: “If He Were Just Gone”

According to Julia, one of the most disturbing moments occurred about three weeks before Fabian’s death. During what seemed like a casual moment in the kitchen, Matthias appeared extremely irritated. When Julia asked about his stress, she did not receive the usual complaints.

Instead, Matthias said that everything would be easier if Fabian were “simply gone.”

It was not an emotional outburst or a desperate cry. Julia describes it as a sober statement, spoken almost like a matter-of-fact calculation. Matthias later tried to dismiss the remark as a “bad joke,” but according to the witness, his tone did not match that explanation. It sounded like someone who had already thought the idea through.

Cold Aggression at the Playground: A Pattern of Harshness

Julia also recalls an incident at a playground just weeks before the crime. Fabian did not want to leave and sought comfort with his mother. Matthias did not react loudly, but with a frightening coldness.

He grabbed the child with such force that Fabian screamed in pain. Matthias showed no reaction at all—acting mechanically and without emotion, as if he were simply dealing with an annoying task.

This behavior matches statements from other people who reported a growing harshness and aggression in recent months, directed almost exclusively toward the young boy.

The “Solution Call”: Ten Days Before the Death

A technical piece of evidence strongly supports Julia’s account: a phone call that took place ten days before Fabian’s death.

Dorina was speaking with Matthias on the phone while the speaker was on, allowing Julia to overhear the conversation. They were arguing about money, pressure, and control. Matthias demanded a “radical solution.” When Dorina refused to give Fabian away, Matthias allegedly said something that still chills investigators today:

“Then we’ll have to find a solution.”

Investigators have since confirmed the call technically—its date, time, and duration match Julia’s precise recollection. It was not a joke, nor a passing remark, but a chilling ending to the conversation.

The Eerie Control After the Disappearance

Matthias’ behavior immediately after Fabian disappeared also raised suspicions. While Dorina collapsed in grief, the father appeared unusually composed—too composed.

In a private moment, he turned to Julia and repeatedly told her that she had to protect Dorina because she was “innocent.”

But how could he say that with such certainty before it was even clear what had happened? Today Julia wonders:

Did he already know more than he admitted?

Forensics and Phone Data: The Mask Begins to Fall

The investigation took another disturbing turn after experts analyzed Matthias’ smartphone.

Deleted search queries were recovered from about a week before the crime. The terms are chilling:

“Fake an accident”

“Child death by fall”

“How to erase traces after an accident”

The defense claims Matthias is simply a true-crime enthusiast who was researching material for a crime story. But investigators see the timing—so close to his own son’s death—as far from coincidence.

One investigator reportedly said bluntly:

“Anyone searching those terms shortly before a child’s death is planning something.”

CCTV footage adds to the suspicion. Matthias’ car was seen near Gina’s house at around 10:00 a.m. on the day of the crime, much earlier than he had claimed in his statements.

Why did he lie about his whereabouts?

Investigators suspect he may already have been at the location while Fabian was still alive.

Intimidation Attempts: “Think About Your Family”

Julia also reports serious attempts to intimidate her after she decided to testify.

She received messages from Matthias’ private phone number warning her to “be careful” and to “think about your own family.”

Julia documented these messages completely and handed them over to the police. They are now part of the investigation file under suspicion of witness intimidation.

Psychological Profile: The Mimicry of Emotions

A criminal psychologist who evaluated Julia’s observations describes Matthias as highly manipulative.

Julia recalls a family gathering where people were crying. Matthias also appeared to be weeping. But in an unobserved moment, she saw his face clearly: it was neutral, empty—completely without emotion despite the tears in his eyes.

According to experts, this suggests someone capable of perfectly imitating emotions to function socially, while internally maintaining an unsettling emotional coldness.

Conclusion: A Case on the Brink of Turning

The public prosecutor’s office is now seriously considering expanding the charges against Matthias significantly.

Julia’s testimony has shifted the focus of the investigation and brought new momentum to a case that had seemed stuck.

Whether Matthias’ explanations will withstand scrutiny in court remains to be seen. But the chain of circumstantial evidence—from witness statements to forensic data and conflicting alibis—is tightening around him.

Meanwhile, the lives of the surviving family members lie in ruins. Fabian’s siblings are suffering from the trauma and mistrust that has torn the family apart.

The truth in this case is complex and painful—but for Fabian, it must come to light.