🔥 Tarot-Reading Influencer Ordered to Pay $10M in Damages for Falsely Accusing Professor in University of Idaho Murders A stunning new detail has just emerged that completely flips the entire story… 👀

Ashley Guillard Tarot-Reading Influencer Ordered to Pay $10M in Damages for Falsely Accusing Idaho Professor of Quadruple Murders

Ashley Guillard.Credit : lordashleyg/TikTok

An influencer has been ordered to pay $10 million in damages to an Idaho professor for falsely claiming she was involved in the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students.

On Friday, Feb. 27, a federal jury ordered content creator Ashley Guillard — known online for theorizing about high-profile unsolved murders, sometimes by consulting tarot cards — to pay University of Idaho professor Rebecca Scofield $10 million in damages for her claims, per court documents obtained by PEOPLE.

According to the initial complaint, filed by Scofield against Guillard in December 2022, the content creator made a series of posts on TikTok in November 2022, claiming that Scofield was responsible for the murders of four University of Idaho students — the gripping case in which Bryan Kohberger later confessed to the killings and received four lifetime sentences.

In her videos, Guillard also allegedly implied or directly stated that Scofield had been involved in a romantic relationship with one of the murder victims, the complaint added.

The complaint went on to say that Scofield sent Guillard several cease and desist letters, though the content creator continued to post videos claiming that Scofield had orchestrated the murders after the student threatened to make their relationship public.

In a June 6, 2024, order, a federal judge sided with Scofield, ruling that the internet personality’s statements were defamatory and based “only” on her “spiritual intuition about the murders” — not “any objective basis.”

The judge also noted that Guillard’s social media posts continued even after the Moscow Police Department issued a press release in December 2022 stating that Scofield was not a suspect in the murder investigation.

University of Idaho entrance sign in Moscow Idaho.

University of Idaho.Don and Melinda Crawford/UCG/Universal Images Group/Getty

During the federal trial last week, jurors heard testimony about how accusations made online can affect one’s reputation in the workforce, even when the allegations are later disproven, reported Idaho News 6.

On Friday, Feb. 27, the jury ordered Guillard to pay Scofield $6.5 million in damages for the allegations related to the University of Idaho murders and $3.5 million for false statements about an inappropriate relationship with a student, per court docs.

“The $10 million verdict reinforces the judge’s decision and sends the clear message that false statements online have consequences in the real world for real people and are unacceptable in our community,” said Scofield in a statement to PEOPLE after the verdict. “The murders of the four students on November 13, 2022, was the darkest chapter in our university’s history. Today’s decision shows that respect and care should always be granted to victims during these tragedies.”

Want to keep up with the latest crime coverage? Sign up for PEOPLE’s free True Crime newsletter for breaking crime news, ongoing trial coverage and details of intriguing unsolved cases.          

In a 21-part series of TikToks posted on March 2 and March 3, Guillard responded to the verdict, disputing the jury’s ruling and calling it “unfair and ridiculous.”

In a statement to PEOPLE, Guillard claimed that the “verdict does not reflect the evidence” and disputed the impartiality of several members of the jury. She indicated she might try to appeal the ruling.

That’s the phrase exploding across headlines after Jordan’s royal circle reportedly delivered a stunning response during Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s latest trip.  What critics are calling a “fake royal tour” was meant to polish their global image at a time when the British monarchy is already under pressure over ongoing scandals.  But instead of a warm reception, insiders say the Jordanian royal family responded in a way no one expected — and it’s being described as a public humiliation.  Sources claim advance contact had been made. Expectations were set. Cameras were ready.  Then everything shifted.  What was supposed to be a carefully managed appearance allegedly turned into a diplomatic cold shoulder that’s now fueling fierce backlash online.  Was it miscalculation? Miscommunication? Or a deliberate message?
Federal agents are back in the picture. New details are being reviewed. Old statements are being reexamined.  And at the center of it all?  Nancy’s own daughter — whose past claims are now being picked apart as authorities tighten the timeline.  What changed behind the scenes? Why is the FBI stepping in now? And what exactly are investigators looking at that they weren’t before?  This case may be closer to a turning point than anyone expected.
Emergency alarms screamed through HMP Frankland — and moments later, Ian Huntley was reportedly on the floor after a brutal metal bar attack.  Sources say the notorious child killer, serving life for the 2002 murders of Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman, was assaulted by a fellow inmate inside the high-security prison.  Three days later, insiders claim he’s “still in a bad way,” under close medical supervision.  The attack was described as sudden. Violent. Over in seconds.  Huntley has long been one of Britain’s most reviled prisoners, and tensions around him have simmered for years behind bars. Even in maximum-security wings built to contain the country’s most dangerous offenders, fury doesn’t disappear — it waits.  Following the assault, lockdown measures were reportedly enforced, and staff remain on heightened alert.  Officials aren’t releasing medical details.  But what happened inside those heavy prison walls — and what it reveals about life for high-profile inmates — is raising serious questions.  Full story in the comments 👇
he sun was barely up last Wednesday when Emily Panuco watched her son run toward three small puppies near their gate. It was a scene of pure innocence—until the world turned dark. 🌑🔍  The adult dogs, driven by a fierce instinct to protect their litter, saw the boy’s hand and launched a brutal assault. There was no room for hesitation. Emily didn’t scream for help; she simply gave herself. She placed her own life between her child and the savage animals. ⚖️✨  While her son escaped the nightmare, Emily bore the full weight of the attack. Today, we remember a mother who didn’t just give life to her child once—but twice. 🛡️👤  SEE THE TRIBUTE: The final photos of Emily and the community’s support for her young son below. 👇