Late-night host Stephen Colbert isn’t backing down from public dispute with CBS bosses

Stephen Colbert isn’t backing down in an extraordinary public dispute with his bosses at CBS over what he can air on his late-night talk show.
On “The Late Show” Tuesday, Colbert said he was surprised by a statement from CBS denying that its lawyers told him he couldn’t show an interview with Democratic Texas Senate candidate James Talarico — which the host said had happened the night before.
He then took a copy of the network statement, wrapped it in a dog poop bag, and tossed it away.
Colbert had instead shown his Talarico interview on YouTube, but told viewers why he couldn’t show it on CBS. The network was concerned about FCC Chairman Brendan Carr trying to enforce a rule that required broadcasters to give “equal time” to opposing candidates when an interview was broadcast with one of them.
“We looked and we can’t find one example of this rule being enforced for any talk show interview, not only for my entire late-night career, but for anyone’s late-night career going back to the 1960s,” Colbert said.

Although Carr said in January he was thinking about getting rid of the exemption for late-night talk shows, he hadn’t done it yet. “But CBS generously did it for him,” Colbert said.
Not only had CBS been aware Monday night that Colbert was going to talk about this issue publicly, its lawyers had even approved it in his script, he said. That’s why he was surprised by the statement, which said that Colbert had been provided “legal guidance” that broadcasting the interview could trigger the equal time rule.
“I don’t know what this is about,” Colbert said. “For the record, I’m not even mad. I really don’t want an adversarial relationship with the network. I’ve never had one.”
He said he was “just so surprised that this giant global corporation would not stand up to these bullies.” CBS is owned by Paramount Global.
Colbert is a short-timer now at CBS. The network announced last summer that Colbert’s show, where President Donald Trump is a frequent target of biting jokes, would end in May. The network said it was for economic reasons but others — including Colbert — have expressed skepticism that Trump’s repeated criticism of the show had nothing to do with it.

This week’s dispute with Colbert also recalls last fall, when ABC took late-night host Jimmy Kimmel off the air for a remark made about the killing of conservative activist founder Charlie Kirk, only to reinstate him following a backlash by viewers.
As of Wednesday morning, Colbert’s YouTube interview with Talarico had been viewed more than five million times, or roughly double what the comic’s CBS program draws each night. The Texas Democrat also reported that he had raised $2.5 million in campaign donations in the 24 hours after the interview.
News
DISTURBING: “TOGETHER.” — THE WORD THAT WON’T LET PEOPLE SLEEP. When Janette MacAusland spoke after her arrest, one idea stood out— “Together.”
“I wanted the three of us to go to God together.” These weren’t the words of a grieving mother—they were the first words out of Janette MacAusland’s mouth after she was caught. But as the true crime community digs deeper, a terrifying question emerges: Was this a sudden “spiritual break,” or was Janette part of […]
UNSETTLING: THE WORDS THAT DON’T MATCH THE TIMELINE. “I wanted the three of us to go to God together.”
“I wanted the three of us to go to God together.” These weren’t the words of a grieving mother—they were the first words out of Janette MacAusland’s mouth after she was caught. But as the true crime community digs deeper, a terrifying question emerges: Was this a sudden “spiritual break,” or was Janette part of […]
CONTROVERSY: “WE WERE SUPPOSED TO GO TO GOD TOGETHER.” — THE STATEMENT THAT SHOCKED WELLESLEY. Those were the first words attributed to Janette MacAusland after she was taken into custody…
“I wanted the three of us to go to God together.” These weren’t the words of a grieving mother—they were the first words out of Janette MacAusland’s mouth after she was caught. But as the true crime community digs deeper, a terrifying question emerges: Was this a sudden “spiritual break,” or was Janette part of […]
THREAD UNLOCKED: THE “CLANCY CONNECTION” PEOPLE CAN’T STOP TALKING ABOUT. Something strange is happening in Massachusetts.
True crime fans are losing their minds over the “glitch in the matrix” between Janette MacAusland and the infamous Lindsay Clancy case. Two high-society mothers. Two wealthy Massachusetts suburbs. The same horrific method. The same “failed” suicide attempt. Is there a “blueprint” for this tragedy being shared in hidden online mom groups, or are we […]
PATTERN ALERT: TWO CASES… TOO MANY MATCHES TO IGNORE. True crime communities are sounding the alarm.
True crime fans are losing their minds over the “glitch in the matrix” between Janette MacAusland and the infamous Lindsay Clancy case. Two high-society mothers. Two wealthy Massachusetts suburbs. The same horrific method. The same “failed” suicide attempt. Is there a “blueprint” for this tragedy being shared in hidden online mom groups, or are we […]
UNSETTLING: WHEN TWO STORIES START LOOKING THE SAME… PEOPLE GET SCARED. They were both seen as devoted mothers.
True crime fans are losing their minds over the “glitch in the matrix” between Janette MacAusland and the infamous Lindsay Clancy case. Two high-society mothers. Two wealthy Massachusetts suburbs. The same horrific method. The same “failed” suicide attempt. Is there a “blueprint” for this tragedy being shared in hidden online mom groups, or are we […]
End of content
No more pages to load
